XPMCK bugs and feature requests :: http://jiggawatt.org/muzak/xpmck/bugs/ XPMCK bugs and feature requests :: XPMCK: Recently closed tasks 2011-06-24T08:06:51Z FS#10: Problems with switching duty cycles in gameboy http://jiggawatt.org/muzak/xpmck/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=10 2011-06-24T08:06:51Z Mr Super User A t150 @01 o3 v3 l8 @01cdef @02cdef (the duty cycle doesn't change) A @q1 t150 @01 o3 v3 l8 @01cdef @02cdef (somehow the @q1 fixed the problem. now it works!)
A @q1 t150 @01 o3 v3 l8 @01cdef @02cdef (somehow the @q1 fixed the problem. now it works!)]]> FS#16: sms/gg CS macro bug? http://jiggawatt.org/muzak/xpmck/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=16 2011-06-24T08:06:34Z Mr Super User As of now, the CS macro can be used on one channel at a time. CS macros used on other channels will either be ignored or will override the other CS macro. FS#24: @MOD not working correctly for PCE http://jiggawatt.org/muzak/xpmck/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=24 2011-06-24T08:06:16Z Mr Super User The playback lib currently sets LFO_CTRL:7 to enable the LFO. It should be clear at all times, and only LFO_CTRL:0,1 should be modified to set the modulation level. FS#23: Early exit loops ( [ ... | ... ] ) are buggy for AT8 and PCE targets http://jiggawatt.org/muzak/xpmck/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=23 2011-06-24T08:05:55Z Mr Super User They don't check the right jump condition. FS#20: PC-Engine support http://jiggawatt.org/muzak/xpmck/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=20 2011-06-19T00:13:56Z Mr Super User A playback library will need to be written for the HuC6280, as well as some additions to the compiler. The first version will probably only support the basic stuff; the standard 32-byte waveforms, white noise (channels E & F), and FM LFO (channel A). @mv will be used for controlling the master volume.
The first version will probably only support the basic stuff; the standard 32-byte waveforms, white noise (channels E & F), and FM LFO (channel A).

@mv will be used for controlling the master volume.]]> FS#22: Atari XL/XE support http://jiggawatt.org/muzak/xpmck/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=22 2011-06-13T01:02:44Z Mr Super User Need to write a playback library for POKEY and generate SAP files. FS#21: VGM exporter doesn't clear the note offset when turning off EN http://jiggawatt.org/muzak/xpmck/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=21 2011-06-13T01:02:20Z Mr Super User @EN1 = {0 3 4 | -7 3 4} A t125 v10 o4 l16 EN1 cdef ENOF cdef
A t125 v10 o4 l16 EN1 cdef ENOF cdef
]]> FS#3: Waveform macro WTM buggy (gameboy) http://jiggawatt.org/muzak/xpmck/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=3 2011-02-18T04:26:54Z Mr Super User @WT5 = {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0} @WTM1 = { WT5 1} C WTM1 v3 o3 l8 cdefg WT5 cdefg In the above example, everything works fine. Both phrases sound the same (except for a slight clicking during the first phrase, why?) @WT4 = {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0} @WT5 = {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0} @WTM1 = { WT5 1} C WTM1 v3 o3 l8 cdefg WT5 cdefg In this example, the two phrases sound much different. And all I've done is define another waveform (which isn't even being used). During the first phrase, the wave is distorted. It's nothing like the triangle wave I have defined. @WT5 = {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0} @WT4 = {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0} @WTM1 = { WT5 1} C WTM1 v3 o3 l8 cdefgab WT5 cdefgab In this last example, everything works fine. The only difference is the order! I defined WT4 after WT5 instead of before! @WTM1 = { WT5 1} @WTM1 = { WT5 1}
C WTM1 v3 o3 l8 cdefg WT5 cdefg

In the above example, everything works fine. Both phrases sound the same (except for a slight clicking during the first phrase, why?)

@WT4 = {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0}
@WT5 = {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0}
@WTM1 = { WT5 1}
C WTM1 v3 o3 l8 cdefg WT5 cdefg

In this example, the two phrases sound much different. And all I've done is define another waveform (which isn't even being used).
During the first phrase, the wave is distorted. It's nothing like the triangle wave I have defined.

@WT5 = {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0}
@WT4 = {0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0}
@WTM1 = { WT5 1}
C WTM1 v3 o3 l8 cdefgab WT5 cdefgab
In this last example, everything works fine. The only difference is the order! I defined WT4 after WT5 instead of before!

@WTM1 = { WT5 1}]]> FS#4: volume buggy when using @EP macro on gameboy http://jiggawatt.org/muzak/xpmck/bugs/index.php?do=details&task_id=4 2011-02-18T04:26:40Z Mr Super User It seems that @EP pitch bend macros are bending the pitch properly, but also affecting the @ve envelopes. for example: @EP1 = {20} A t150 l8 @ve-7 @02 o3 v8 cdef EP1 cdefg The first phrase is played stacatto - because the @ve-7 envelope makes the volume decay quickly. Good so far. The second phrase starts to use our pitchbend. The volume gradually increases instead of decaying. Bug!
for example:

@EP1 = {20}
A t150 l8 @ve-7 @02 o3 v8 cdef EP1 cdefg

The first phrase is played stacatto - because the @ve-7 envelope makes the volume decay quickly. Good so far.
The second phrase starts to use our pitchbend. The volume gradually increases instead of decaying. Bug!]]>